Understanding the Difference Between Liberty

And Freedom in Our Founding Documents

Will Help Us Regain What We Have Lost

by

Jim Noorlander

Our liberty vouchsafed by our founding documents is under serious attack and we have lost much of our liberty and freedoms. It is critical that we as Americans know how serious this is, how to understand the important issues, and what we can do about it. Given that most of us are not experts on the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States, the question is, how can we know for ourselves what is right, what is wrong, what is constitutional, and what is not constitutional? And for some of us, we feel the responsibility to befriend the Constitution, defend the Constitution, and to save the Constitution. As I have considered the matter for many years, the “key” to this problem has been staring us right in the face. If we look from a historical perspective, we have drifted from our moorings and original intent of these founding documents. A proper understanding of the difference between liberty and freedom will deliver us from both spiritual and political darkness.

Patrick Henry said it well, “It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded not by religionists but by Christians; not on religion but the gospel of Jesus Christ.” As we review the motivation for most of the founders, we find the Bible was backbone to everything they did. Yet within that context, and this is a very important point, freedom of religion is both allowed and protected because of liberty as defined in the gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason, peoples of other faiths have been and are offered asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship. Patrick Henry also said that the gospel of Jesus Christ cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often. This “key” has been set aside over the years and has been replaced more and more by humanism and secularism, which has had the direct effect of destroying liberty. As we will see, this “key” is fundamental in the founding documents.

Since this great nation was founded upon the gospel of Jesus Christ, and the Bible was the backbone to everything the founders did, where would one go to find a proper definition of liberty? Would it not be the Holy Bible? Let us then examine a few quotes about liberty and apply them to the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States.

In the scriptures we find some 37 quotes related to liberty, and we learn some very fundamental truths as we study these in context. But for the reader of this paper, I will only mention three. To the Corinthians Paul declared, “Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is Liberty.” (2 Cor. 3:17) The Apostle James proclaims, “But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.” (James 1:25) And finally, in James 2:12 it states, “So… speak the law of liberty.” From these scriptures and the several others relating to liberty as given us by the Lord and as were used by our founders, we see that liberty is not only the heart of the gospel of Jesus Christ, but the Lord’s Spirit, His law, and His word.

If we now take the proper definition of the word liberty and apply it to the preamble of the Constitution which states the purpose of the Constitution, perhaps the reader will see a more meaningful purpose of what the founders intended when establishing this great nation. The Preamble states:

“We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

I will address all the points of the preamble, but for the moment I will focus only on the phrase “secure the Blessings of Liberty.” If one of the purposes of the Constitution was to secure the blessings of liberty, and liberty by definition is the Lord’s Spirit, the Lord’s law, and the Lord’s word, what then was the purpose of the Constitution? It was to secure the blessings of the Lord’s Spirit, law, and word. This is an important concept to understand because it points out the fact that the Constitution was based upon eternal principles–gospel principles. That is why John Adams said, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people.”

Now, continuing: How are we as individuals, communities, and as a nation going to have a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, and promote the general welfare, without the Lord’s perfect law of liberty, which is taught in our Bible? (James 1:25)

As we examine what is constitutional and what is not constitutional using the Lord’s standard as our moral compass, by word and example, let us ask some very important questions. What has the Lord said about abortion, about same-sex marriage, pornography, and prostitution? Using the Lord’s standard of “thou shall not steal,” and “thou shall not covet,” what do you think the Lord’s position would be on socialism and her twin sister, communism? You see the point. Any law that would violate God’s law and the basic tenants of the Judeo-Christian principles that this nation was founded upon would be considered unconstitutional. You see, then, that it does not matter what the majority wants or what the minority wants–any law that violated God’s law was unconstitutional. This, then, would be the tempering influence on a pure democracy where it is thought that the majority rules and on America’s republican form of government.

Using these principles and the Constitution, let us apply them to today’s challenges to befriend, defend, and save the Constitution. What would be the approach of a president or a governor if Obama Care, which is highly socialistic, is deemed constitutional by the Supreme Court? What would be the founding fathers’ position?

Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution reads, “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government.” A United States form of republican government is a government based upon morality, virtue, and the Separation of Powers Doctrine, i.e., a three-branch government. Since all branches of government take an oath to support the Constitution, are not all branches of government taking an oath to secure the blessings of liberty? Are not all branches of government taking an oath to secure God’s law for its people?

This is why the Separation of Powers Doctrine is so vital to our republic and to our form of government. When any one branch of government is faced with an unlawful order – let us say lawless judges – say no and, using the Constitution to protect liberty, stand there until justice is served. Then, so the nation or the state is not left to the mercy of the crisis in saying no to the judges, the president or governor is to turn to the legislature and ask of the people and their representatives to have the judges removed for the sake of the law, for the sake of the constitutional integrity, for the sake of self government, and for the sake of liberty.

Whenever any branch of government, in this case the judges (or it could be a president), destroys liberty it becomes the duty and obligation of the other two branches of government to defend liberty and God-given rights. In this regard, there are two fundamental principles involved that must be understood. First, the Supreme Court, because of the Separation of Powers Doctrine, is not the final answer. Second, every branch of government – federal, state, and local – can, and should, address these violations of liberty. Man cannot and should not be allowed to overrule what our Creator has already ruled to be wrong and be subjected to the flattery of politicians, lawyers, and citizens who lead away the hearts of many people. The reason we had laws protecting liberty was to prepare the minds of the children and to remind every generation that some things are just wrong. This course of action is not the breakdown of law as some suggest but upholding “The Law” meaning the laws of God.

At this point the reader can look at almost any piece of legislation and know for themselves what is right, what is wrong, what is constitutional and what is not constitutional. But if we continue, there are a few more all encompassing issues that should be addressed that can and will give the reader the proper perspective of what this great nation is all about.

It is a fact that there is nothing worse than trying to solve a problem if one does not understand the nature of the problem. The low standards you see in America today–the corruption, the out-of-control welfare state, abortion, same-sex marriage, pornography, prostitution, the bailouts of America, illegal immigration, Obama Care, are all symptoms of a disease. The disease is socialism and removing God from our institutions, which is contrary to the Constitution and Declaration of Independence. Socialism manifests itself in many ways, but primarily begins when you remove personal responsibility and accountability from the lives of the citizens. The more a nation embraces socialism, the more godless and secular the nation becomes. For years the politicians have been promising the American people great things at their own expense. In exchange for those promises, the politicians receive honor, prestige, and security in their present positions. They honor themselves rather than honoring God. It is a victory for Satan when he can bind man down by personal sin. But it is a horrific grand sweep when he can damn an entire nation under a government that promotes incorrect principles.

Now I would like to stop for a moment and point out the obvious and kindly and humbly instruct the reader. Using the principles that we have been discussing, I’ve just instructed the reader in religion, morality, and knowledge according to the Northwest Ordinance of 1787. These principles were to be taught in our schools and territories. Did I say anything about the Jews? Did I say anything about the Catholics, the Baptists, the Muslims, or the Latter-day Saints? I did not. Can you imagine if these principles were taught in our schools and territories today, it would set the hearts of the youth on fire. Have you ever considered what is being taught and how it is being taught is fundamental to all our problems of all our social ills in America today. This along with unlawful decisions of the Supreme Court of this land are the primary causes of the breakdown of the American family and that the Bible is no longer the primary book being used in our schools and in our homes. Noah Webster, who gave us our first American Dictionary of the English Language in 1828 said, “God’s word, contained in the Bible, has furnished all necessary rules to direct our conduct.”

So, to be perfectly clear on the subject, why is abortion wrong? Why is same-sex marriage, pornography, prostitution, debt, socialism (Obama Care), and communism wrong? They are wrong because all these unlawful violations of the Constitution destroy liberty – the perpetuation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Now to the main principle of this paper: We never use our freedom to destroy liberty. I repeat, we never use our freedom (agency or free will) to destroy liberty. We never use our freedom, agency, or free will to destroy God’s law, word, and Spirit, which provide our liberty. We use our freedom, to follow God’s plan of happiness, which cannot be had without liberty. (Proverbs 3:13) If people and nations are given freedom and they do not understand liberty, what do they do with their freedom? They tend to harm one another in selfish ways.

By following God’s word, God’s law, God’s Spirit, ie., God’s plan of happiness, we, as individuals, communities, and a nation can rise above the poverty around us, enjoy greater health, repent, forgive and be forgiven, find joy in serving others, and “form a more perfect union.” Ultimately, we lose our lives for Christ in unselfish service to promulgate His truths of eternal life and Heavenly Father’s perfect plan of happiness, which is all based on liberty.

Over the years many nations have adopted our Constitution as their own and have failed. The reason is because those nations bought the car (the Constitution) but forgot to buy the fuel (national morality) that goes into the car (the pump or the force behind the fuel being the Declaration of Independence).

This leads me into my final remarks. If we are to understand the Constitution we must also understand the Declaration of Independence. John Quincy Adams, the son of John Adams, said that the Declaration of Independence was “the spirit” of the Constitution. The Declaration states that this nation would be guided by the “Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God.” This term “law of nature” is in regard to the concepts of godly principles and recurs often in the writings of the founding fathers which would also include Blackstone. The laws of nature and the laws of God are superior to all other laws – over the entire world. The founders taught that mans laws are to conform to God’s laws, or they are not valid.

The laws of nature and the laws of God remind us once again that all the aforementioned issues destroy liberty and would be unconstitutional. The Declaration also reminds us that the founding fathers of this nation appealed to the Supreme Judge of the world for the “rectitude” of their intentions. Rectitude means righteousness. Once again, we do not have the freedom to do whatever we want but what we “ought” to be doing and to follow God’s plan of happiness. Remember, the people of this nation have the right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

In conclusion, I testify that the Lord’s plan of happiness and the founding documents of this nation are better than any other. He knows us, loves us, and desires to bless and help us. Isaiah prophesied (See Isa. 61:1-2, Luke 4:16-21: Gal. 2:4; Gal. 5:1) that the Savior came to set us at “liberty.” Patrick Henry said, “Millions of people armed in the holy cause of liberty are invincible by any force which our enemies can send against us. Besides, Sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destiny of nations.” I believe as the Apostle James that “The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much.” (James 5:16) Therefore, if we – you and I – will repent of our sins, political and others, we could call down the powers of God upon this nation and her leadership and, once again, give to the world America’s greatest gift – truth, righteousness, liberty, freedom, and happiness. The Constitution of the United States is to protect the moral agency of all men and is, still is, part of the Creator’s great plan of happiness. May its principles long be “established?” May we all help to make it again a land of liberty? Let us use our freedom to choose liberty; then we can and will be “The Land of the Free.”

I am,

Your friend,

Jim Noorlander

I’m very excited to announce that there is now a Constitution Basics eCourse available for free, here:  www.thomasjeffersoncenter.com!!

Just type in your name and email and the course will be delivered to you over the next few weeks (an email every few days).

The course is based upon the work of W. Cleon Skousen, a constitutional expert.  His daughter, Sharon Skousen Krey is the author – I’m just putting it online for her and creating the delivery mechanism with Infusionsoft.  It is a GREAT course and contains fun activities for all ages (4 & up).

It won’t stay free for long, but once you register, you’re in. 

Great education for all …anywhere in the world.
All should sign up . . . soon.  Also read the other things on the Thomas Jefferson web site.

Please let us know what you think!

Trevan Householder
P.S.  We encourage you to forward this to all the Freedom-Loving Patriots you know.

1925 Supreme Court Changes to the United States Constitution

In 1913 changes to the United States Constitution were made by the enactment of the 16^th and 17^th amendments.  The 1925 Supreme Court in the Butler Case decision used the newly enacted amendments to justify changes to the United States Constitution. 

The Founding Fathers constitution had checks and balances placed within the governing document that established to limit the power and authority of the Federal government over the lives of the people.  The Founders were fearful that an all powerful Federal government would not be responsive to the people’s rights. 

Historically prior to the U. S. Constitution governmental bodies were not responsive to the rights and freedom of its citizenry.  It was not until the enactment of the U. S. Constitution in 1789 that the rights and freedom of people were to be protected.  The Founding Fathers were aware of the adage that power corrupts and that absolute power corrupts absolutely. The checks and balances were established in the original Founding Fathers Constitution so that the Federal governments appetite for power could be controlled.

Enactment of the 16^th and 17^th amendments to the constitution negated the checks and balances that were in the original constitution.  The 16^th amendment allowed the Federal government to directly tax each State’s citizens.  The 17^th amendment removed the United States Senators as “sentinels” to protect the rights of their state.  The Senators no longer had to report back to their State do determine what actions needed to be taken in Washington D. C.

U. S. Constitution Turned Upside Down

These amendment modifications allowed the Supreme Court to drastically make changes to the United States Constitution in their Butler Case decision that reversed the documents purpose.  This one decision has turned the constitution upside down.  Whereas the constitution was originally written to protect the rights and freedom of the people, the newly revised constitution, after the Supreme Court decision gave the Federal government unlimited control and authority.

The Founding Fathers constitution limited the powers of the Federal government.  The new constitutional Supreme Court interpretation has reversed the the authority positions of power from the people to the Federal government.  The Federal government is now free unbridled and unrestrained to do whatever.  The people now have limited power to control their Federal government. 

Out-of-Control Federal Government

The States which had originally given the Federal government its powers and authority now found themselves subrogated under the control of an all-powerful Federal government.  In less than a hundred years from this historic 1925 Supreme Court decision the freedom of the people has been greatly curtailed accompanied by a Federal government that has established an unprecedented debt obligation on the people.   The government’s appetite for power must be controlled or America will collapse.

The system without the checks and balances does not provide sufficient motivations for members of congress to curtail the runaway actions of the Federal government.  It is irrelevant which political party the congressional members represent as the system established by the current constitution does not provide motivation to protect the rights and freedom of the people.  The current governmental system rewards congressional members who recklessly  increase benefits for their individual electorate in order to get re-elected. 

The U. S. Senators no longer protect the rights of their State.  The people’s rights and freedom are not being protected by any of the governmental branches.  Governmental control must be returned back to the people.

Repeal the 17^th Amendment

Repealing the 17^th amendment to the constitution will reinstate the authority of the States allowing the State governments to VETO inappropriate Federal actions.  Without restoring VETO authority to the State governments the states will not have the power to stop the unbridled Federal abuses. 

Failure to control the Federal government will lead to national insolvency.  This insolvency will have unparalleled consequences affecting life, freedom and the ability of the people to pursue happiness.  It is imperative that the Federal government be bridled by the people. 

Healing America

Just as changes to the United States Constitution had unknown consequences the process of healing America must be accomplished with great care and deliberation.  The checks and balances established in the original Founding Fathers Constitution must be restored so that the ills facing America can be tackled without creating other problems. 

Inappropriate or untimely modifications to the constitution may produce consequences that produce results that further the loss of rights and freedom of the people.  It is so important to re-establish the United States Senators as “sentinels” for the States and the people prior to addressing other actions to correct problems. 

By restoring the checks and balances of the original Founding Fathers constitution America can begin the healing process.  America can return to its position of greatness.  A free American people allowed to be productive will lead the rest of the world back into freedom and prosperity.

Founding Fathers view on Religious Freedom

Of primary importance to the Founding Fathers was their belief that all religions should be protected by law whether Christian or non-Christian.  This is the first time that this premise of religious equality had been protected by law, a legal charter or constitution.  The Founding Fathers felt that religious freedom was paramount to the functioning of a moral free society.

Early Americans entwined views of liberty along with religious beliefs that one could not separate from the other.  Religion was essential part of everyday life in the newly formed United States.  Though the Founding Fathers felt it was important to separate church and state it was essential that religious morals prevailed in all government dealings. 

George Washington believed that religion and morality were the pillars of society and provided the greatest possibility for human happiness.  The Founders believed, because of man’s disposition and habits, that religion and morality were essential elements of political prosperity. 

Universal Fundamentals

As important as religion was to the early Americans it was important that no religion infringe on an individual’s beliefs or tenets.  Standards were established based on fundamental religious beliefs and these standards were taught in the schools. 

The Founding Fathers were adamant that there be a separation of church and state, but not religion and state.  Youth as well as government leaders should live by a moral code.

Schools taught recognition of a Creator who had revealed a moral code for happiness which helped men understand right from wrong.  Schools also taught that we would be held accountable for the way we treated one another and that in the next life we would be judged according to the decisions we made. 

School instruction was limited to the universal fundamentals so as to not have an outside political body instruct religious tenets.  The schools were to teach the youth the basic beliefs which united everyone. 

Religious Test for Government Service

The Founding Fathers felt that anyone holding a government position should possess the highest qualities of moral character.  However, the Founders as avid students of history knew the problems created by requiring religious tests for members of government. 

It was felt that religious tests for government service would give the Federal government too much control over who could or could not serve in government.  It was essential that members of all religions be eligible to hold a public office in the government. 

All Freedom Central to Religious Freedom

The Founding Fathers believed that religious freedom was essential if men were to enjoy any other freedom. This is because our rights come from God. These rights are referred to as unalienable rights in the Declaration of Independence, the right to life, the right to liberty, and the right to pursue a course in life that will bring happiness. If these rights are violated the offender will come under the judgment of God.

The right to religious freedom is also an unalienable right. In fact, the Supreme Court has stated numerous times that freedom of religion is the most precious unalienable rights next to life itself.  Religious faith and living by moral values is the best way to protect our freedom and security.

Checks and Balances

Our Founding Fathers were fearful of their Federal government becoming abusive to the people.  The accompanying fear of an abusive system of government is a run-a-way government that is not being prudent in how the people’s money is spent.  Due to these fears the Founding Fathers sought ways the central government’s powers could be controlled.  A system of Checks and Balances was established to bridle the activities of the Federal government.

States Separate Federal Government from the People

The Founding Fathers felt that the State leaders were best prepared to protect the people’s rights from a run-a-way government so a political wall was established between the people and the Federal government.  Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution defines what the Federal government was allowed to do. 

James Madison the acknowledged Father of the Constitution stated that the powers granted to the Federal government are few and defined.  A short list of twenty powers were assigned to the Federal government; limiting its powers and responsibilities.  These powers were given by the State governments to the Federal government. 

In Article 1, Section 8 the Federal government was given the twenty powers that the States felt were best suitable for a Federal government to be allowed to do.  The Federal government was restricted to these twenty powers.  Any increase in the powers assigned the Federal government would have to be modified by the people.

Bill of Rights

Even with the Checks and Balances that were placed into the Constitution to protect the rights of the people some of the Founding Fathers were still hesitant to sign-onto the Constitution.  To get the acceptance of these Founding Fathers the “Bill of Rights” was added to the Constitution. 

The Bill of Rights goes into greater clarity defining the powers the Federal government is NOT allowed to do.  It was felt by many of the Founding Fathers that the central government would attempt to over step their specified list of powers if the Bill of Rights were not added to the constitutional document. 

Balance of Power

The checks and balances ensure a balance of power.  The structure of the Federal government creates a balance of power.  The checks established in the constitution were created by the Founders to keep the Federal government under control.

The House of Representatives has the assigned responsibility to protect the rights of the people.  House Representatives are elected by the people to represent their needs for a period of two years.  The representatives were to be subject to the people thereby protecting the people’s rights.

The U. S. Senators were to be appointed by their respective State legislature.  The Senators were assigned the responsibility to represent the rights and needs of their State.  These Senators were to report back to their State’s legislature actions that were being taken at the federal level of government.  The State legislature would then decide what actions the U. S. Senators would take for the benefit of their state.

The President of the United States was to be the administrator of the House of Representatives as well as the Senate protecting the rights and freedom of the people along with the States.  In this way there is a balance of powers created designed to protect the unalienable rights of the people.

Checks

The key to the established checks within the constitution is the VETO authority of each of the branches of government.  The House of Representatives has the ability to VETO actions taken by the SENATE as well as actions taken by the PRESIDENT of the United States.  In turn, the Senate has VETO power over the House of Representatives as well as the President.  The President in turn has VETO authority over the actions taken by the House and Senate.

It is these VETO powers giving authority to each of the branches of the Federal government that create the “checks” of powers and abuse.  Use of the VETO authority creates the balance of power as it guarantees that NO laws can be passed unless the people’s rights and the state’s rights are fully protected. 

Main Duties of the House of Representatives

The House members have the power to VETO legislation that does not benefit their electorate the people.  The House of Representatives has the power to tax the States.  No where within the original constitution was the Federal government given the right to tax the people directly.  Revenue required by the Federal government was to be levied onto the States.  The House has the power to SPEND; the power to BORROW.  The House of Representatives are responsible for the GENERAL welfare of the people.  The House is responsible to handle affairs that deal with multiple States.  Decisions of the House of Representatives can commit the States funds as well as actions.

Responsibilities of the Senate

The Senators were to be the “sentinels” for the States to protect their State’s rights.  Senators were to be appointed by their state legislature for a period of six years.  The Senate was designed to be a stable element cooling the actions of the House and President of the United States.  The Senate terms were established to be for a six year period along with being staggered so as to avoid emotional political turmoil.  The Senators were to be the stabilizing influence at the Federal government level. 

The Supreme Court

The Supreme Court was established to ensure that the constitutional provisions were adhered to by all parties.  The Supreme Court was to be the “watchdogs” of the constitution to further protect the unalienable rights and freedom of the people. 

The Supreme Court was given the power and authority to overrule the actions of the President and the bi-camel congress if actions taken were found to be contrary to the limitations and powers established in the constitution.  In this way excesses of government could be controlled.

RECAP

This system of checks and balances worked well for over 130 years.  The people’s rights as well as the State’s rights were protected.  In 1913 the established checks and balances were drastically altered creating many of the problems we as a nation are undergoing today.  The enactment of the 16^th and 17^th amendments have virtually destroyed the established checks and balances found in the Founding Fathers Constitution.

The Founding Fathers Constitution

The Founding Fathers of the United States were directed as well as inspired by God in the creation and writing of the United States Constitution.  Over the 220 plus years that the constitution has existed the constitution has undergone many changes.  To distinguish the original constitution from the constitution that the United States is governed by today we will call the original document the Founding Fathers Constitution.

The U. S. Founding Fathers were provided with a unique perspective that few people in history have experienced firsthand that is living under both extremes of government rule.  The authority of a tyrannical government as well as living under an ineffectual government charter with insufficient powers to govern. 

Initially life under the King George III of England was acceptable.  In fact, most of the people enjoyed life under the authority of the King of England.  As time passed grievances arose that the King was unable or unwilling to address.  The King’s unwillingness to correct the problems encountered by the colonists mounted till corrections had to be made.  The King refusing to address the problems worsened the situation for the colonists by adding additional laws, tariffs and taxes onto the backs of the colonists. 

A once loved King George III became a tyrannical leader.  The U. S. Founding Fathers attempted to redress the situation through every legal avenue they had available.  This eventually led to a hardening of positions on both sides which in turn led to the Revolutionary War.

Life under an Ineffective Government Charter

The colonies after cutting ties with England established a charter the Articles of Confederation to administer the duties, obligations of the thirteen colonies as well as conducting the war.  The Articles of Confederation were found to be ineffective not providing sufficient authority to the central government. 

The Articles of Confederation were dependent upon the colonies relinquishing authority over their territory.  The colonists as well as their colonial governments were unwilling to give the central government sufficient authority to effectively govern the thirteen colonies.   In spite of these deficiencies the Colonists were able to win the Revolutionary War.   George Washington credited the colonies performance in the war to acts of Providence.

The colonists lived several years under the limited authority of the central government governing using the Articles of Confederation charter.  This allowed the colonists to understand the disadvantages of life under a government that did not possess sufficient authority to effectively rule.  Living under these two extremes the Founding Fathers knew the disadvantages of both governmental entities.  The Founding Fathers historical experience allowed them to create a comprehensive document designed to protect the rights of the people.

The Founding Father’s Constitution

Life under the rule of the King taught the colonists to fear absolute control.  Whereas life under the charter of the Articles of Confederation taught the Founders that a central government must have certain powers and authority to be able to govern properly.  Faced with these two opposing positions the U. S. Founding Fathers undertook the creation of the United States Constitution.

Checks and Balances

The Founders were fearful that a central government over time would increase its authority and control over the people established sets of checks and balances to limit the ability of the central government to morph into a tyrannical government without the approval of the States and the people.  To protect the rights and freedom of the people checks and balances were established.

Thomas Jefferson believed that the government at the State level, being closer to the people, would provide the people with greater representation.  By balancing the authority of the national government with the combined powers of the States the powers of the national government are limited.  In this manner the powers of the Federal government are balanced between the States and the Federal or central government. 

Though the power of the Federal government was now balanced the Founding Fathers were still fearful that the central government could still develop into a tyrannical government body.   Further checks were established to limit and restrict the ability of the central government from acquiring additional authority and power over the people. 

Among the checks three entities of the national government established branches with specific duties and responsibilities.  Each branch had VETO authority over the other branches.  The bi-camel congress was given separate distinct responsibilities.  A bi-camel congress was established to represent their segment of the controlling government bodies.  The Senate was to defend the State’s rights whereas the House of Representatives were to represent the people.  It is this VETO authority that provides the checks to an out-of-control Federal government.

States Rights

The Federal government’s authority and powers are derived directly from the States.  The States were placed between the Federal government and the people.  In this way the States are a “Wall of Political Protection” protecting the rights and freedom of the people.  To accomplish this control authority the States were provided with Senators that would be under direct control of their State legislature. 

The U. S. Senators were to report directly to their State legislature to determine the response the Senators should or should not take at the Federal level of government.  The U. S. Senators were appointed by their States legislature.  The Senators were subject to the dictates of their particular State’s legislature.  In this way the States could protect the States authority as well as protect the freedom of its citizenry from infringing power of the Federal government. 

The House of Representatives was established to represent and protect the people of their state.  The House Representatives were elected by their state’s registered voters.  The House Representatives served subject to the dictates of the people.

Founding Fathers

The Founding Fathers established the separation of powers along with the redundancy of checks and balances so that the unalienable rights and freedom of the people could be adequately protected.  The Founders were so fearful of the possibility that the central government would morph over time to become tyrannical that the Bill of Rights was added to the Founding Fathers constitution. 

The Bill of Rights established the specific restrictions dictating the limits that were to be placed on the Federal government.  It was only with the addition of the Bill of Rights to the constitution that all the Founders got on board willing to accept the Founding Fathers constitution as the official governing document.  The Founders constitution was completed in 1787 and enacted in into the law of the land in 1789.

Free Market Economics

Long before Karl Marx the American Pilgrims experimented with socialistic practices in the hopes of creating a fair just society.  The pilgrim settlers had contracted with their merchant-sponsors in London for their passage and supplies to the new world.   The pilgrim’s had established the socialistic program that was initially followed only to be replaced by a free market economics system after the first year.

For the Full Story

Experiment with Socialism

The contract they obligated themselves to in London required products of their labors to be shared equally among everyone in the community.  Their first year in the New World was difficult nearly half of the pilgrims died of sickness, exposure to the elements or starvation. 

The following spring the native Indians taught the pilgrims how to farm, fish and hunt.  With this newfound knowledge the lives of the pilgrims improved however they were still unable to prosper at their new venture of life in America. 

The pilgrim’s contract with their merchant sponsor called for everything to be held by the entire community.  The community proceeds were to be distributed equally among the community members.  No one in the community owned anything.  The initial pilgrim settlement was established as a commune. 

The pilgrims understanding their survival needs for the second winter in this new wilderness devoted only the labors that were required of them.  Their newly acquired knowledge and skills helped them to survive but not prosper.   The community members were not willing to labor for another man’s benefit.

The pilgrims led by William Bradford decided to scrap the social experiment established in their original contract with a system that rewarded individual industriousness and creativity.  The surviving pilgrims were allowed to own property along with enjoying the benefits of their labors.  The pilgrim colony then began to flourish.  The community was able to repay their sponsors in London.  The pilgrims had discovered that free market economics which rewards personal efforts works benefiting everyone in the community. 

Free Market Economics Results in Wealth for the Poor Upward Mobility

For free market economics to function property ownership must be recognized.  Allowing people to benefit from their own labor creates incentives producing overall economic development.  Over the last 100 years free market economics has been instrumental in reducing poverty along with increasing life expectancy than man had experienced in the previous 5,000 years.  Though these benefits have been real we have not had a totally free market economics system to fully function as government has been allowed to encroach on man’s unalienable rights and freedom.

The United States Constitution was established to protect the rights and freedom of its citizens.  Protection of the unalienable rights and freedom has allowed the free market economics system to not only benefit the citizens of the United States but the population of the entire world.  It was the guarantee of freedom provided by the Founding Fathers Constitution that has unleashed this creativity and development world-wide.   Men will put forth labor when they know that labor expended will go for their benefit.

Centralized Planning

Under a centralized economic system such as socialism there is a person or committee that must decide the number of items that are produced for the societies benefit.  How is that decision made?  From where is the data procured that goes into making the decision as to the number of units that is necessary to fulfill the requirements of the overall group? 

There is no source where this information can be found as society is in a continual change.  Therefore the decisions made at the central planning level are always incorrect.  There are either too many products produced or there are too few. 

If you were a government employee with the job of deciding how many products were to be produced which option would you choose; producing too many or too few.  Under socialism or a centralized planning model there are always too few products produced for the masses as it is safer to have a demand for more than to have produced too much.

Allowing People to Decide or Decentralized Planning

Under free market economics system the people are free to make the decision as to the numbers of a product that are necessary from one day to the next.  If the supply of a product is insufficient the price of that product increases.  An increase in price invites more people to produce. 

When the supply of a product is greater than the demand for that product the price of the product decreases.  The consuming public makes the decision on a day to day basis as to the number of units that are necessary to fulfill the demands. 

The price system under free market economics determines the overall numbers of products that are available for the consumer.  The people decide what products will or will not be produced and in what quantities the products will be produced. 

Free market economics is the door to creating wealth for the poor.  The price system of a free market allows consumers to determine the use of resources.  The “price system” determines what people can afford, what sells, what gets manufactured.

Our Founding Fathers Constitution

In 1789 a constitution was enacted that guaranteed the rights and freedom of the people would be protected from government tyranny.  This act along with the freedoms to try, to fail, to succeed, including the freedom to possess the benefits of one’s own labor opened up the flood gates for development in the United States and the world.  The enactment of the U. S. Constitution was the first time in the history of man that all the principles of freedom were made available at one time. 

Repeal the 16th Amendment 

Actions to repeal the 16^th Amendment would return the checks and balances that had been originally placed in the Constitution.  The 16^th Amendment was a major blow against States Rights.  The States were no longer a barrier between the people and the Federal government.

Our Founding Fathers established the States to be a “Wall of Political Protection” between the citizens and the Federal government.  This Wall of Protection was one of the checks that were placed into the constitution to assist in bridling an out-of-control central government.

The 16^th Amendment to the United States Constitution allowed the Federal government to directly tax citizens of the United States.  Prior to the enactment of the 16^th Amendment the Federal government would tax the individual States for monies it needed to operate.  The States then had to decide how the necessary funds were to be collected from the State’s population. 

What is a Constitutional Amendment?

An amendment to the constitution permanently changes the constitutional document.  Changes to the constitution must be made carefully so that the unalienable rights of the people are not adversely affected.  A constitutional amendment not only affects the constitution it may affect other related laws.  Our Founders made adoption of constitutional amendments difficult to avoid reckless changes to the constitution.

To protect the rights of the people additional requirements was established mandating that ¾ of the States approving any changes made to the constitution.  This approval was to be performed by either the State’s legislature or a specifically elected constitutional convention committee.  Failure of ¾ of the States to approve an amendment would negate that amendment.

Article 1, Section 9 of the Original U. S. Constitution

Article 1, Section 9 of the U. S. Constitution prohibited the Federal government from collecting taxes or funds from individuals.  The Federal government was limited to collecting revenue from the States according to that State’s population.  Each state was responsible for determining how the individuals within the state were to be apportioned for their individual share of the monies levied against the state.

Our original constitution gave the Federal government the power and authority to collect revenues from limited specific sources.  The Federal government was authorized to set tariffs, excise taxes, along with consumption taxes.

The 16^th Amendment to the U. S. Constitution

The 16^th Amendment severely damaged State rights by allowing the Federal government to tax the State’s citizens directly.  The 16^th Amendment and the following 17^th Amendment have severely damaged the “Wall of Political Protection” that the Founding Fathers had established to control the Federal government.   By repeal the 16th Amendment and repeal of the 17th Amendment the damage to the checks and balances established within the constitution can be corrected.

• The 16^th Amendments reads as follows:  “The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regards to any census or enumeration”.

Repeal the 16^th Amendment

The Wall of Political Protection or checks and balances must be re-established in order to bring the Federal government back under control.  The power and authority of the States must be returned.  It is important to repeal the 16^th Amendment however of greater priority is to repeal the 17^th Amendment. 

Repeal of the 17^th Amendment will give the States power and authority to once again bridle the Federal government.  After the 17^th Amendment has been repealed we can proceed to repeal the 16^th Amendment. 

Failure to correct errors placed in amendments to the constitution in a proper order will open up the possibility of greater control being taken from the States and given to the Federal government.  Corrections to the constitution must be done with care and forethought. 

Healing of America

America can be healed.  Through education followed by deliberate actions the errors placed in the constitution can be corrected.  The healing of America can be accomplished in a relatively short period.

States Rights

Our Founding Fathers were allowed to experience two governmental extremes, totalitarianism as well as near anarchy by a government authority not having sufficient power to rule.  Faced with these two extremes the individual states rights became paramount.  The newly formed government constitution of the United States allowed the individual states to retain their powers and authority over the Federal government.

Great effort and analysis of earlier government forms were researched to determine the strengths as well as weaknesses of each.  Biblical, Greek, Roman along with Anglo-Saxon history were analyzed in order to find a governmental form that would recognize man’s unalienable rights as well as providing the central government sufficient authority to govern efficiently. 

The United States Constitution embodies the principles that were rediscovered by the Founders as they searched for suitable government rules regulations and laws.  In 1789 the resulting constitution was enacted.  This newly formed government provided for the individual states to each have rights.  These States rights provided the states power and authority over the Federal government.  The Federal government was limited to only the rights specified in the constitution and allowed by the States.

Wall of Political Protection

The States rights became an integral part of the “Wall of Political Protection” that was established to protect the rights and freedoms of the people.  The States became the wall that separated the people from the Federal government.   All government rights that had NOT been specifically given to the Federal government belonged to the States. 

The Federal government’s actions were to be controlled by the States.  Any actions by the Federal government that over stepped the governments allotted powers the States had the power and authority to curtail.  The States were a “check” on an out-of-control central government.

The constitution by establishing checks and balances allowed the government to efficiently operate while keeping the central government controlled.  The Founding Fathers did not want a Federal government that was as bad as or worse than they had experienced under the rule of a King of England. 

Checks and Balances

Before a law could be enacted the Executive as well as the House of Representatives and the Senate must be in agreement.  Each of these governmental bodies had the authority to veto the actions of the other.  The States had the power through the Senate to control the actions of the Executive branch as well as the House of Representatives.  

The Senate prior to the 17th amendment was appointed by their respective state legislators.  In order to keep their position as U. S. Senator the senator had to do the bidding of his state legislators.  The U. S. Representative of the House of Representatives is elected by the people of his state.  He is motivated to follow the directives and wishes of the voters who placed him in the office. 

Senate Protected States Rights

The Senate represented the States.  The House of Representatives represented the people of their respective state.  The Executive Branch or the president has been given the responsibility as to Chief of State, Commander of Chief of the military, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Diplomat, Chief Architect of needed legislation as well as the conscience of the nation.  In these responsibilities the President of the United States represented the people as a whole.  Each division of the government has veto power over the other. 

The States rights are there to protect the freedoms of the people.  Without the States having the power to veto the other two branches of government the Federal government through bribery and intimidation will be allowed to expand without limit. 

States Rights

Our original constitution species what the Federal government can and cannot do.  All the remaining powers and authority fall into the States rights.  In this way, the States are the sole protector of the people’s unalienable rights and freedoms.

Repeal the 17th Amendment

Repeal the 17th Amendment will reinstate the checks and balances originally set in place by our Founding Fathers in the constitution.  Until the checks and balances are fully reestablished correcting the ills of America will not be possible.

The Founding Fathers

Our Founding Fathers had experienced tyranny by living under the authority of an unjust King.   The Founders were fearful that the government that they were about to establish would take on responsibilities that it had NOT been allocated. 

An all powerful central Federal government would be no different than the government they had fought the Revolutionary War for freedom.  To prevent the newly established government from becoming as over bearing tyrannical as that of the King of England certain checks and balances were established to stop any encroachment of power by the Federal government. 

Established “Checks and Balances”

The Founders established the States with powers along with the authority to control the actions of the Federal government.  The State’s senators were given the power and authority to veto actions of the Federal government as well as the House of Representatives.  The 17^th amendment destroyed the ability of the States to control the government.  It is necessary to repeal the 17^th amendment in order to restore to the State’s their ability to control an over bearing central government.

Wall of Political Protection

Our Founders had established the States as a barrier or wall between the people and that of the central government.  All actions by the Federal government had to first go through the people’s respective State government.  Taxes levied were allocated against the States which in turn determined how those taxes were to be paid by the citizens of each respective state. 

The State’s were able to exercise their veto powers whenever the Federal government over stepped its bounds.  Taxes or regulations placed upon the States that were unjust could be vetoed.  The State Senators were the sentinels for their respective state working on the States behalf to veto any unjust laws that would unfairly affect their state.   The State’s U. S. Senators functioned in this manner for over 100 years until 1913 when the 17th amendment was enacted.

The 17^th Amendment

Enactment of the 17^th amendment destroyed the balances of authority the Founding Fathers had placed in the constitution to protect the rights and freedoms of the people.  No longer were the senators obligated to do the bidding of their respective state. 

Under the original constitution the U. S. Senators were appointed by the State legislators to serve the State for a period of six years.  The U. S. Senators worked for their State reporting back to the State legislators actions that were occurring at the Federal government level.  The State legislators then advised the U. S. Senators what actions they should or should not take with regards to the procedures of the Federal government.  Our state legislators kept control over the Federal government by controlling the actions of their appointed United States Senators.

Today’s U. S. Senators

Today the U. S. Senators campaign for votes from the voting population of their respective state.  The U. S. Senators have no obligation to follow or listen to the directives from their State’s elected authority.  An established check on the Federal government was eliminated. 

Currently our U. S. Senators campaign for votes just has the House of Representatives campaign directly for the people’s votes.  As such the U. S. Senators have NO motivation to protect their state from an over bearing central government.  In order to get re-elected the Senators find that
providing benefits catered to the FEW but politically powerful fulfill their base to being elected to the office of U. S. Senator. 

The people within the state thinking they were going to get more power and control over their U. S. Senators have found they now have less.  Even in these perilous economic times facing the Federal government the U. S. Senators has little motivation to correct the problems facing America.

Repeal the 17^th Amendment

By repealing the 17^th amendment a check on the Federal government is re-established.  Once again the State’s can veto unjust unfair laws regulations and taxes.  This reinstatement of the checks and balances established by our Founding Fathers will be the beginning of the healing of America.